Amazon and Freedom of Speech Censorship in the 21st Century

So I completely forgot what I was doing before I ran into Wikipedia's article on Amazon controversies, and I ran across a book called the pedophiles guide to love and pleasure: a child lovers code of conduct. The book is written by Philip R. Greeves and is often dubbed the pedophiles guide. From my limited understanding, which I'll explain later, it appears to be a instruction manual weren't opinionated Book that explains how to molest children. (and sorry for the punctuation, capitalization Errors, I'm using voice dictation software and apparently Apple doesn't know how to use formatting.) Readers threaten to boycott Amazon, And a bunch of people or just pissed off that Amazon was selling a book that taught people or future pedophiles the fundamentals or I don't really know, but I wanted to detail how to molest entities children and be a pedophile. Amazon defended the sale as saying they were not going to sensor content, And went back and forth a few times under moving book, relisting it, removing it again, relisting it, and ultimately they did end up removing the books permanently. But apparently this book was so bad that the child safety organization issued a statement saying that the book should be removed because it lends the impression that child abuse is normal. Don was so pissed off about this, and I still am. So this is one authors view at his own opinion that makes pedophilia look normal. I'm going to make the same argument that in the 18th-century, slavery was perfectly normal. Who is okay to abuse slaves, whip them, rape them, or do whatever the hell you want to them because they were slaves. If you were booked during that time about how slavery is so bad, your book might be banned, Just like the Canterbury tales. Is the Canterbury tales bad now? No, I've been writing school. I actually want to know why it was banned so maybe I will get up next. But in his eyes, it offered an explanation for what he did, If he even did it at all. There's no evidence suggesting that he was a pedophile, And legally all he did was use his power of free speech. But now, I really want to get a copy and see for myself what the book entails. What makes a book get banned? I thought in the 21st-century, we were past this. Yes pornography exists, but it still on the Internet, and it's not a problem. This sounds totally like censorship which is against free speech, and although I don't think Amazon was legally required to take the book down, I really think they should've kept up. What's interesting is I can't even find a copy of this book anywhere after a lot of searching on the web, looking it up on database sites, and even looking at sites to torrent it, That is, a place to share files through the pirate Bay where people get illegal movies download illegal stuff, watch porn, and all that other bad stuff. So yes, just because being a pedophile is bad and stuff, Doesn't mean that this person's opinions should be taken down. In fact I'm so pissed off at the fact that society wants to censor stuff, No matter how bad it is, that I want to get the rights from Philip and post it for the Internet to see, And damn the Christians that want to censor America. Because what's next? If we can just start censoring books because society thinks it's bad, then where are radical ideas going to come from? Where can we see and take a look into the minds of the pedophile?I really wanted to see into the mind of a pedophile, See the thought process, and at least making a tent to understand his viewpoint. So yes maybe it appears that she tries to make pedophiles seem okay and pedophilia is normal, but we're adults. We'll sort through that. If I want to write a book I'm how to make a homemade bomb, I think I should have the right to. Yes Terrace can use that book, maybe children will learn how to make bombs, And yes maybe some bad stuff happened as a result of that. The information is already out there, What's the point of trying to hide it? What is the point of censorship what it almost never works? Because I'm going to email a few emails that I've scene and I'll probably get the file. I genuinely want to read this book, not cause I'm a pedophile, but I want to see what the whole controversy is about, I want to see how bad a book can get. But now I can't do any of that because Society says that the book is way too bad and it's terrible and all the children were going to read a book and think pedophiles are okay.

So excuse the rant, and Please don't complain that I'm a pedophile. I just think free speech is important, no matter how bad it is.